Well, it's official - Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes are engaged. I guess a couple of months of brainwashing - errr, dating - can really sweep a girl off her feet.
Katie has mentioned that when she was a little girl, she used to dream of marrying Tom Cruise. I wonder if that dream included her conversion to a cult, which I'm sure that Tom, Mr. "if-they-don't-like-Scientology-well-then-f***-you" was very objective about. Oh well...she's not the first woman in history to do something like that for her man.
On a related note, how much freakier can Tom get? He's suddenly this over-the-top, wacko kinda guy instead of the cool, handsome leading man. I'm not sure that this recent development has been a good career move, but I suppose he has plenty of money to retire on.
All around, it's just kinda weird - like Flava Flav and Brigitte Nielson kinda weird. Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
Saturday, June 18, 2005
Sunday, June 12, 2005
Why aren't we impeaching president shrub?
Of course, I know why - we have a very imbalanced government in the U.S. right now. But when I read articles about the inadequacies of bush jr. (such as this one of the Downing Street Memo), I just can't seem to figure out how half of the population still supports him. Why, oh why?
People were in an uproar over Clinton getting it on with Lewinsky in the Oval Office, which I might point out did not involve anyone but the two of them (and Hillary unknowingly) until it was blown up into a huge scandal by the republicans.
But somehow people don't care that our tax dollars are wasted on all kinds of ridiculous things, such as imaginary threats of a washed up dictator. They don't care that legislation passed to protect us from pollution in our air and water are now being defeated; and they don't care that programs that help people, such as adults who need job training due to layoffs, are being cut by the bush administration by 74%. These, of course, are merely a few things among a myriad of other detrimental policies.
Listen, if you support this guy and his crooked administration, don't come complaining to us (democrats) about the terrible illnesses your family and friends get due to increased pollution and environmental causes. And don't tell me about how difficult it is to get a job because you can't get retraining when the programs are cut. You brought it on yourself by supporting bush jr. and "moral" agenda, which is nothing more than a thinly veiled code name for increasing the gap between the middle class and the rich.
But, I still say that we should impeach the @$$hole, and make him and his wealthy friends pay off the national debt they've caused us to incur.
People were in an uproar over Clinton getting it on with Lewinsky in the Oval Office, which I might point out did not involve anyone but the two of them (and Hillary unknowingly) until it was blown up into a huge scandal by the republicans.
But somehow people don't care that our tax dollars are wasted on all kinds of ridiculous things, such as imaginary threats of a washed up dictator. They don't care that legislation passed to protect us from pollution in our air and water are now being defeated; and they don't care that programs that help people, such as adults who need job training due to layoffs, are being cut by the bush administration by 74%. These, of course, are merely a few things among a myriad of other detrimental policies.
Listen, if you support this guy and his crooked administration, don't come complaining to us (democrats) about the terrible illnesses your family and friends get due to increased pollution and environmental causes. And don't tell me about how difficult it is to get a job because you can't get retraining when the programs are cut. You brought it on yourself by supporting bush jr. and "moral" agenda, which is nothing more than a thinly veiled code name for increasing the gap between the middle class and the rich.
But, I still say that we should impeach the @$$hole, and make him and his wealthy friends pay off the national debt they've caused us to incur.
Friday, June 10, 2005
Awful Web sites
So, I'm in the market for a couple of toy poodles. I've been googling to come up with some breeders in my area, and I've also got some recommendations from various sources.
In all of the sites I've seen, I have yet to come across one that I think is well done. Most have ridiculous backgrounds, hideous colors, poor navigation, awful grammar and spelling, and some even play horrible MIDI tunes. There's little worse than having to wade through all of that crap just to figure out if you have a litter of puppies, especially when you're charging hundreds of dollars for each dog.
If you are the owner of one of these sites, please do all of us a favor and think about the design of your site. This advice is really for anyone designing a site, but I've come to notice the dog sites in particular due to my recent search activities.
If you need some help, check out Vincent Flanders' Web site for some tips.
In all of the sites I've seen, I have yet to come across one that I think is well done. Most have ridiculous backgrounds, hideous colors, poor navigation, awful grammar and spelling, and some even play horrible MIDI tunes. There's little worse than having to wade through all of that crap just to figure out if you have a litter of puppies, especially when you're charging hundreds of dollars for each dog.
If you are the owner of one of these sites, please do all of us a favor and think about the design of your site. This advice is really for anyone designing a site, but I've come to notice the dog sites in particular due to my recent search activities.
If you need some help, check out Vincent Flanders' Web site for some tips.
Saturday, June 04, 2005
Street ass
So, I absolutely love my sister-in-law, Kati. Today, we headed out to IKEA to do some random shopping. Along the way, we drove past a guy with half his ass exposed on the street. No, I'm not kidding. It wasn't even like he was overly huge or anything, but nonetheless, there was his big ol' ass hanging out. It was far worse than regular plumber butt. He was chatting it up with the neighbor next door, without a care in the world (obviously).
It could almost go without saying that Kati and I busted up laughing. It just wasn't something that you see every day (thankfully, I might add). I'm not sure why the guy didn't notice his ass hanging out of his pants, but maybe it's just an every day kind of thing for him or maybe he has no nerve endings in this butt. Perhaps it's like Tara Reid, whose breast popped out on the red carpet one day and she had no clue. In any case, it was an alarming sight and I can only hope that one day someone will buy him the proper size of pants to cover up his ass.
It could almost go without saying that Kati and I busted up laughing. It just wasn't something that you see every day (thankfully, I might add). I'm not sure why the guy didn't notice his ass hanging out of his pants, but maybe it's just an every day kind of thing for him or maybe he has no nerve endings in this butt. Perhaps it's like Tara Reid, whose breast popped out on the red carpet one day and she had no clue. In any case, it was an alarming sight and I can only hope that one day someone will buy him the proper size of pants to cover up his ass.
Friday, June 03, 2005
Bad news
So, one of my sisters was diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis this week. It's a very helpless feeling knowing that I live several hours from her and because of that I can do relatively little to help her out.
Wednesday, May 18, 2005
Theaters in Kentucky refuse to show movie
I like to point out stupid things, so here's another shiny coin to add to your bank of insanity. Apparently there are a couple of movie theaters in Kentucky that refuse to show the film Monster-in-Law because of the position that Jane Fonda took against the Vietnam War. While I doubt that our country is in need of another dumb, romantic comedy like Monster-in-Law, this whole thing seems to be a tad bit of an overreaction. Ike - seriously - see a counselor and let go of that resentment. The war is over (in Vietnam at least)...
I find it odd that the very people who are so adamant about protecting American freedom and liberty, are usually the very first people to step in and squash it. And with the current administration, it's just getting worse as time goes on because we keep protecting these idiots when we should really be giving them a kick in the pants, sending them back to the sandbox, and teaching them to get along with others who are different from them. I thought that was something we were supposed to learn in kindergarden or first grade, but a lot of people seem to have lost that message somewhere along the way.
On the flip side, I'm sure that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is ecstatic about this guy. They're protesting the movie on the basis that Jennifer Lopez is in it, and her clothing line uses animal fur. I wonder what Ike thinks about that...interesting thing to ponder; two different agendas coming together in one kinda weird way.
In any case, Ike can do whatever he wants - he does own the theaters after all. And if this kind of thing makes him feel better about his own insignificance...well, I say go for it dude and buy yourself a Corvette while you're at it. Life's too short to stop compensating for a small penis and an even smaller brain.
More information on Fonda Film Banned From KY. Theaters.
I find it odd that the very people who are so adamant about protecting American freedom and liberty, are usually the very first people to step in and squash it. And with the current administration, it's just getting worse as time goes on because we keep protecting these idiots when we should really be giving them a kick in the pants, sending them back to the sandbox, and teaching them to get along with others who are different from them. I thought that was something we were supposed to learn in kindergarden or first grade, but a lot of people seem to have lost that message somewhere along the way.
On the flip side, I'm sure that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is ecstatic about this guy. They're protesting the movie on the basis that Jennifer Lopez is in it, and her clothing line uses animal fur. I wonder what Ike thinks about that...interesting thing to ponder; two different agendas coming together in one kinda weird way.
In any case, Ike can do whatever he wants - he does own the theaters after all. And if this kind of thing makes him feel better about his own insignificance...well, I say go for it dude and buy yourself a Corvette while you're at it. Life's too short to stop compensating for a small penis and an even smaller brain.
More information on Fonda Film Banned From KY. Theaters.
Wednesday, May 04, 2005
Womens' rights slipping away
The debate about birth control is starting to heat up in the US. A growing number of pharmacists are refusing to fill prescriptions for birth control, and even some doctors are refusing to discuss birth control with patients under any circumstances.
The reasoning? Because those pharmacists and doctors oppose birth control on moral grounds. As though things in this country aren't ridiculous enough, now we're having to contend with not getting our medical needs met. And some states are working on legislation that would protect these idiots. It's enough to make my blood boil.
A person's religious and moral values are personal. I have my own set of religious and moral values, but I don't jam them down another person's throat. Why? Because I happen to understand that we have a freedom of religion in this country, which means that people can either choose a religion or even choose not to have a religion. Plain and simple.
Here's a good rule of thumb for those who can't figure out the obvious:
I realize that in areas where there are a lot of people, the impact of this type of objection is small. However, I'm concerned for women who live in rural areas where it may already be difficult enough for them to get to a doctor or pharmacy without the added issue of being judged by someone else's moral values.
More information in the article Pharmacists 'denying birth control' on the BBC Web site.
The reasoning? Because those pharmacists and doctors oppose birth control on moral grounds. As though things in this country aren't ridiculous enough, now we're having to contend with not getting our medical needs met. And some states are working on legislation that would protect these idiots. It's enough to make my blood boil.
A person's religious and moral values are personal. I have my own set of religious and moral values, but I don't jam them down another person's throat. Why? Because I happen to understand that we have a freedom of religion in this country, which means that people can either choose a religion or even choose not to have a religion. Plain and simple.
Here's a good rule of thumb for those who can't figure out the obvious:
- Don't become a stripper if you object to showing your body in public.
- Don't become a cook at a fast food restaurant if you object to cooking meat.
- Don't become a pharmacist if you object to filling prescriptions written by medical doctors.
- Don't become a doctor if you object to considering birth control as a valid treatment for various conditions, in addition to preventing pregnancy.
I realize that in areas where there are a lot of people, the impact of this type of objection is small. However, I'm concerned for women who live in rural areas where it may already be difficult enough for them to get to a doctor or pharmacy without the added issue of being judged by someone else's moral values.
More information in the article Pharmacists 'denying birth control' on the BBC Web site.
Tuesday, May 03, 2005
House Bill 1515
Recently, our Washington state senators voted on House Bill 1515, which would have made discrimination against gays and lesbians illegal in this state. Unfortunately, the bill failed by 1 vote. We can thank senators Jim Hargrove and Tim Sheldon (both conservative democrats) for joining the republican ranks to defeat the bill.
Hargrove is quoted as saying, "I have nothing against anybody who participates in this behavior...This issue is whether I believe the behavior is right or wrong."
Errrr - wrong Senator Hargrove. Was the bill called "House Bill 1515 - Homosexuality is Okey Dokey by Me"? I don't think so. The issue was not for you to determine whether homosexuality is right or wrong; it was about discriminatory practices aimed at homosexuals who are (among other things) trying to get jobs without being scrutinized for their sexual orientation. I fail to see how that is anything other than a civil rights issue.
While I understand that some people disagree with homosexuality, I don't understand why they think that discrimination against gay and lesbian people is OK. By not supporting such a bill, they are at the very least tacitly agreeing that discriminating against someone for a job, insurance, loans, etc. is OK. And it most definitely is not OK.
More details on the Seattle Times article, Gay-rights bill falls 1 vote short of becoming state law.
Hargrove is quoted as saying, "I have nothing against anybody who participates in this behavior...This issue is whether I believe the behavior is right or wrong."
Errrr - wrong Senator Hargrove. Was the bill called "House Bill 1515 - Homosexuality is Okey Dokey by Me"? I don't think so. The issue was not for you to determine whether homosexuality is right or wrong; it was about discriminatory practices aimed at homosexuals who are (among other things) trying to get jobs without being scrutinized for their sexual orientation. I fail to see how that is anything other than a civil rights issue.
While I understand that some people disagree with homosexuality, I don't understand why they think that discrimination against gay and lesbian people is OK. By not supporting such a bill, they are at the very least tacitly agreeing that discriminating against someone for a job, insurance, loans, etc. is OK. And it most definitely is not OK.
More details on the Seattle Times article, Gay-rights bill falls 1 vote short of becoming state law.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)